Last Update: 11/15/2017 13:23 +0300

 

Site 1JAR2 Blog Button

 

JAR2 Biz

 

The WikiLeaks Fairytale: Sources/Supporters Dead or Arrested

Did Assange really go AGAINST the operation? Perhaps.

Curated by John Robles

Fact of the Day: Every visitor to WikiLeaks automatically gets placed on an list. Every journalist, associate or contributor working with WL not on the USG payroll gets placed on a Red List. In all my years of working with WikiLeaks even after I asked Hrafnsson directly about these lists, no attempt was ever made to publicize or expose this targetting. Alarm bells should have gone off but Assange has a gift for making people trust and believe him. A very special gift that they have exploited.

Israel Shamir is a MOSSAD Agent. From 2010

http://aangirfan.blogspot.ru/2010/12/assange-shamir-disinformation-agents.html

Newsweek's Fake Assange Interview- Is He Dead?

Newsweek's Fake Assange Interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BFFvGNSLmk

Watch Assange CGI Saying Seth Rich was WL Source

http://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-kim-dotcom-murder-wikileaks-fox-news-sean-hannity-russia-hillar

06-20-2017 IT IS OVER FOR ME ASSANGE IS PART OF THE OP. EVERY SOURCE AND LEAKERS ARRESTED OR DEAD

We Were Right Again: Pamela Anderson Never Dated JPA

http://theduran.com/pamela-anderson-writes-open-letter-to-julian-assange/

Pamela Anderson and Lady Gaga, Those Sprit Cooking Pizzagate MKULTRA Whores Continue to Lie in the Media

http://www.sundayworld.co.za/shwashwi/2017/05/20/pamela-anderson-and-lady-gaga-rally-to-cause-of-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange

Fake Anon Trutherbotwhite Threatens Me on Twitter: "If you go against WikiLeaks on authentication you are going to lose."

May 20, 2017 22:36 MST GMT +3

https://twitter.com/trutherbotwhite

Twitter's Notorious Censor Identified: @Jack Ass

Twitter has been warned about FAKE @julianassange. Does nothing

RELATED PAGES ON JAR2

SNOWED IN

http://www.jar2.com/Topics/Snowden.html


5th Column Rus

US_5th_Column_in_Russia

Anonymous

http://www.jar2.com/Topics/Anonymous.html

RAW Leaks

http://www.jar2.com/Topics/Raw_Leaks.html

JAR2 BIZ

www.jar2.biz

JAR2 BLOG

http://www.jar2.com/INDEX.HTM


MADE by the NSA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2WSI

CIA MEDIA

SPREADING LIES ASSANGE ALIVE AND WIKILEAKS NOT UNDER THEIR CONTROL

Media partners creating the lies:

WASHINGTON TIMES

NEW YORK POST

THE WASHINGTON POST

RT

THE INTERCEPT

CNN

NY POST

KASHMIR MONITOR

TWITTER and other Social Media

FOX NEWS

ALL MURDOCH OUTLETS

THE GUARDIAN

EXPRESS CO UK

THE MERKLE

TPM

THREATPOST

THE INDEPENDENT

THE SUN

Curator John Anthony Robles II

John Anthony Robles IIдекабрь коллаж WikiLeaks викиликс

Media Deliberately Smearing Julian - Christine Assange Mother of JPL

25 June 2012, 15:44

Exclusive interview with Christine AssangeAssange and truth: A plea from Christine Assange

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Christine_Assange.html

John Shipton Father of JPA Chief-Executive Officer of the WikiLeaks Party

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/John_Shipton.html

Jesselyn Radack National Security and Human Rights Director

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Jessylyn_Radack.html

Michael Ratner US Lawyer for Julian Assange and Human Rights Defender

Passed Away Unexpectedly May 11, 2016

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Michael_Ratner.html

Kristinn Hrafnsson WikiLeaks Co-Founder, Official Spokesperson

001

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html

Greg Barns President of Australian Lawyers Alliance

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Greg_Barns.html

Craig Murray Former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Craig_Murray.html

Samantha Castro Co-Founder WikiLeaks Australian Citizens Alliance

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Sam_Castro.html

Mary Kostakidis International TV News Anchor: Letter to Ecuador

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Mary_Kostakidis.html

Andreas Fink CEO DataCell Iceland: An Inconvenient Truth

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Andreas_Fink.html

Scott Ludlam Australian Senator: Australia Gave Up on Assange

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Scott_Ludlum.html

Jacob Appelbaum TOR Creator: Assange Lost Faith in Justice System

http://m.ruvr.ru/2012/06/26/1294809934/300px-Jacob_Appelbaum_4227.jpg

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Jacob_Appelbaum.html

Mark Stephens Only Copy/No Audio as it was scrubbed/CIA Connection

https://sputniknews.com/voiceofrussia/2010/12/08/36470921.html
John Robles: This is John Robles. I am speaking with Mark Stevens, the attorney for Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks.

John Robles: Hello, Sir. How is Julian right now?

Mark Stevens: He is not too happy at being in jail but his spirit is as good as it can be expected in these circumstances.

John Robles: Is he being treated correctly?

Mark Stevens: Yes, of course, he is. The British authorities are very good and impartial on these issues. The one thing that is slightly frustrating is that we have another court hearing on December 14 and I’ve not been permitted a legal visit until December 13, which, of course, gives me less than 24 hours to prepare his case.

John Robles: Are you kidding? You haven’t been allowed to see him yet?

Mark Stevens: No, I haven’t spoken with him or anything else. It’s very difficult obviously to prepare the case but at the moment I don’t have details of the evidence against him yet and this is something that the prosecutor – perhaps one would even say ‘persecutor’ – from Sweden has been playing hide-and-seek with for some months now. Julian Assange sought information in August, asked about the nature of allegations against him and has this far being denied access to that information. I think he believes he could rebuff it.

John Robles: Neither he nor you even have the charges or details on the case against him in Sweden?

Mark Stevens: Well, we have the details of the charges now and that was read in court yesterday. But the allegations were made back in the middle of August and for the very first time yesterday we heard what they were in court. But Julian has a right to have it communicated to him in a language so that he understands not only the charges but the allegations because he hasn’t actually been charged.

John Robles: Is that a normal procedure just to give you one day to prepare? I mean that sounds really unreasonable to put it mildly.

Mark Stevens: Well, I think it is unfortunate. It’s fair to say that.

John Robles: How can you properly prepare a case in one day? I don’t think that’s possible.

Mark Stevens: No, neither do I. And I think, you know, we have seen Julian Assange is on the attack from a number of different courts both in terms of cyber-attacks on the sites – the fact that organizations like MasterCard and Visa have shut down their access although it is worth pointing out that these organizations are quite happy to take money from pornographers and racist organizations like the Ku-Klux-Klan and a legal organization like Wikileaks doesn’t seem to be able to garner their attention.

John Robles: And I read that Post Finance – I guess that’s the name of the Swiss bank – froze his account, his legal fund.

Mark Stevens: Yes, and this is really quite unusual because Swiss are very proud of their banking secrecy. But for some reason on this occasion they not only froze his account but they also made it public. We’re still trying to pursue and work that out. But that was quite unusual and aberrant behavior. And again you to look and ask yourself why is it that all these things are happening in the week that cables are going ahead. One can therefore conclude that the proceedings are politically motivated.

John Robles: Do you think this was a response to the cables, I mean that they did it real quick? And as far as the arrest, did Julian turn himself in or was he tricked into something? I mean, how that happened?

Mark Stevens: We didn’t expect a warrant from Sweden because he was offering to cooperate with him. So he was quite happy to come by appointments and meet with the police. But some months ago he asked me to get in touch with Scotland Yard and say that if something came from the Americans, for example, please get in touch with me and we would make arrangements for a civilized meeting by appointment, which is the usual way. But he is not on the run as he was.

John Robles: Yes, I believe if I remember correctly he offered to meet with investigators on three occasions. And then they dropped the charges completely, right?

Mark Stevens: That’s right. The Chief Prosecutor of Sweden’s said there was not a shred of evidence against him and that he didn’t need to have the case pursued and she gave him permission to leave the country. He’d stayed there for 40 days trying to resolve this and they refused to meet him and give him the evidence. Then, of course, a politician got involved and he took these women out of Stockholm to Guttenberg and on the same facts started another prosecution with another prosecutor. I know that in most countries that would be an abuse of process. It appears though that in Sweden this is what the Prosecutor is doing.

John Robles: I don’t believe that you can prosecute someone for the same crime in two different courts. That sounds really unusual.

Mark Stevens: He was never actually prosecuted. But it is unfortunate that there was (a) a long period of time and (b) that this particular prosecutor – and I would say ‘persecutor’ – is actually pursuing him in the way she is. She could quite easily get on the plane, come to London, if she really wants to talk to him. Because if you are the woman who made this complaint indeed if you are Julian Assange and you want to be vindicated ultimately, any prosecutor who is interested in truth or justice or the rule of law should be interviewing the person in the most convenient way. And the most convenient way is to get on the plane. Everybody knows where he is today. He is in prison. So get on the plane, come to the prison, bring the file and we can have a conversation.

John Robles: Sure. I can’t go too deeply in it. But the charges, I believe, involve something about not using a condom so that the women had not actually complained about being raped to begin with?

Mark Stevens: Certainly, as I understand it the women had consensual sex with him before and after these alleged incidents. But we do not know what the nature of the allegations are because beyond that what we’ve heard briefly in court, because we haven’t got the file and we haven’t got the evidence. In fact I asked the Australian High Commission in London and the Australian Embassy in Sweden to get in touch with the Swedish authorities and the British authorities and let’s have a copy of this evidence, let’s see it.

John Robles: In one of the newspapers they said that Sweden will become the laughing stock of the entire planet if they prosecute someone for rape for not using a condom. I mean is that an actual law in Sweden? Can you comment on that?

Mark Stevens: That is not a law in Sweden and I think that is going to be a problem area. So until we see the file I really can’t go too much in any detail because obviously I have to talk to my client about what to say in answer to the allegations when I see them.

John Robles: There’s one thing I want to ask you: what exactly is going to happen on the 14th? Is that going to be like a pretrial hearing or is it the actual extradition hearing or what?

Mark Stevens: No, it’ll be the hearing when the issues are identified and then once they are identified we’ll have an idea of how long the hearing will take place and the date will be scheduled, probably the end of January or the beginning of February.

John Robles: What do you think Julian’s next move will be? Can you comment on that?

Mark Stevens: I plan to visit him. That is a part of my next stage. And we’ll see where we’ll go from there.

John Robles: Can you comment on the insurance file? I am sure you know what I’m talking about.

Mark Stevens: Yes, I do. I think the insurance file has been much misrepresented. But obviously it’s public knowledge that Wikileaks have suffered enormous numbers of attacks in different sources. They are concerned that they may be at some point in the future prevented from publishing the remainder or the entirety of the file. And as the result of that what we have done is ensured that it is available for posterity, to historians and news organizations from this point in time and academics. So they place it out in the community. But, of course, that is entirely separate from these allegations against the editor-in-chief and editor-in-chief of Wikileaks currently finds himself indisposed but like any news organization when the editor’s on holiday or finds himself indisposed somebody else steps into the bridge and others carry on publishing the newspaper. And that’s what is happening with Wikileaks. They are continuing to publish today.

John Robles: Is he going to release the key to this case?

Mark Stevens: Not in relation to the proceedings in Sweden as he currently got on foot.

John Robles: I was doing some research last night, because I am doing a piece on his case right now, and I found some information on the Internet about Anna Ardin -- that she has connections with the CIA. Do you know anything about that? She was apparently working in a group called Las Damas de Blanco (The Ladies in White). It’s an anti-Castro group that has been funded by the CIA. Do you know anything about that?

Mark Stevens: I have seen these suggestions in the blogosphere. At the moment I don’t know the strength of that and I might be interested to know from anyone who has actual evidence on the subject.

John Robles: Professor Michael Celso apparently is a specialist. I can give you my email so that you can see some information. Can you go into the defense that you are planning to mount?

Mark Stevens: No, till I see the files, I can’t.

John Robles: This is terrible not to have any files to go on.

Mark Stevens: It is very frustrating for myself and for Julian and indeed for others who are following this case because until you actually know what the allegation is it’s almost impossible to respond to it.

John Robles: Thank you very much, I’ve just been told that we are out of time. We had about ten minutes. If you don’t mind I would really like to stay in touch with you and keep up on the case.

Christine "AnnSands" Nevada: FBI Anon-Harvester

Some of WikiLeaks' Victims

Jeremy HammondBradley ManningAnonymous

Seth RichMichael RatnerJohn Robles

2017

NOTE: Anything reported to be by WikiLeaks or Julian Assange after October 16, 2016 is part of a CIA Limited Hangout Psychological Operation. All interviews, op-eds and releases are CIA manufactured

11-16-17 The Penultimate Final Nail on the Legitimacy of WikiLeaks Has Been Pounded In

It was totally unexpected and unplanned and not covered by the media of course, which has been complaint in the WikiLeaks fabrication since day one, and the source of the revelation was totally unexpected but we now have confirmation of everything I have been saying for years. WikiLeaks is a criminal fraud, a fake, an entrapment operation and completely under the control of the CIA and what Americans have labeled the Deep State. The fact that they have been instrumental in the murder of dozens, if not hundreds of whistleblowers, hackers, activists, lawyers, honest intelligence officers and even their own associates makes WikiLeaks one of the most long running murder operations in history, all created and executed to protect the mass murderers behind 911, the MOSSAD and Israel and the Rothschild Illuminati New World Order psychopaths. 

The latest revelations about WikiLeaks (Think about that for a moment! Revelations and leaks about a fake operation that was supposed to have been engaged in revelations and leaks! The irony is historic!) come from none other than Donald Trump Jr. of all people. In their drive to try to create a fake Russian connection where there is none they have outed almost their entire operation. So let's look at some direct messages Mr. Trump was nice enough to share with the world, this is actually stunning!

Mr. Trump actually only sent WikiLeaks a total of three messages and his last was a question which WikiLeaks did not answer. The supposed WikiLeaks having the password to a site trying to push the Putin Trump smear even in September ties in with Snowden trying to blame Russia for hacking in the summer. It also shows WikiLeaks is just a branch of a larger command operation. In the first e-mail we see WL confessing to having the password and asking Mr. Trump to promote WL's Clinton material. In the second WL ignores Mr. Trump's question completely but tries to recruit Mr. Trump to promote WL and spread their links. There is a strange use of "it" when talking about storie(s).

The third and fourth exhibits show messages in which WL is pandering for Trump's tax returns and the stunning thing is WikiLeaks wants Trump to help them improve the perception of their impartiality. So while colluding with Trump and pandering to his camp WL seeks to boost their own credibility by creating a false leak of Trump's tax returns. This is quite stunning. In other words WL is offering to fabricate a leak for their own reputation and for the political expediency of the party they are pandering to. To talk about corruption is benign. This is worse. WL also pretends to be indignant of Clinton "slander" in calling them pro-Trump in a letter pandering to Trump's son.

Exhibits 5 and 6 are also stunning as WL attempts to control the outcome of Trump's behavior if he loses and complains about rigging an election when it is election meddling that WL is involved in. It was not Russia who interfered in US elections. It was WL and those behind it who singlehandedly destroyed the Clintons.

Exhibits 7, 8, 9 and 10 - Here WL is attempting to get Assange an Australian Ambassadorial Post by way of an American Presidential Candidate whom he is helping and WL is so sure of their own worthiness that it is actually stunning. Here we also see WL almost begging for e-mails and material to release which they claim the opponents already have, meaning WL has no expertise, hackers or anyone on the inside in the Clinton Camp? Being as WL completely devastated Anonymous this would indicate there is no one left. These four e-mails show a cold calculating WL which plans in advance on how their releases will affect public opinion and influence social and political processes. Although WL destroyed the Clinton Camp it is clear they do not have even a basic working relationship with Trump's people. Three very short messages the last of which Mr. Trump's question was not even answered and then a barrage of messages from WL seem to show that WL was actually harassing the Trump Camp in their attempt to pander for a political advantage or even Ambassadorial post. 

Exhibits 9 and 10 - Who is behind all of these DMs? Did Assange write these messages? Did Mr. Trump delete anything showing a more intimate relationship? Given they were obtained by the US authorities I doubt it. Did WL which is registered in the US and which is an intelligence op meddle in US elections? Did Assange go rogue? Does it really matter? Can Australia charge Assange with anything for attempting to receive an Ambassadorship through a US President?

What matters is that WikiLeaks is a conniving million dollar entrapment operation and at this point it is clear Assange has been replaced. All of these DMs show a WL that orchestrates leaks, has no independence in obtaining material (meaning everything they have ever released is now suspect) and one that panders to politicians and attempts to create, orchestrate and manipulate public perception and public thinking through it's "work" which you would not call journalism. A Limited Hangout created to obfuscate 911 and entrap and get rid of whistleblowers, hacktivists, hackers and as it turns out political opponents.

 

is actually

10-17-17 They Truly Believe We Are All Retarded

For my long time followers you all remember when I contacted Hannity about Seth Rich and offered him evidence that Seth Rich was murdered in the hospital by an Asteroids team and immediately after that Hannity within an hour stopped his Seth Rich investigation. Well now we know 100% Hannity is in on it. Again I repeat Seth Rich was shot then taken to a hospital where he was de-briefed and killed.

09162017 Conclusion: Seth Rich was the WikiLeaks Source for the Clinton/DNC Files. He passed thumb drives to Craig Murray in a park and then was assassinated. My investigation points to either the Clinton/WB/Asteroids or the CIA/MOSSAD controllers behind the WikiLeaks Operation itself or the third version that it was MI6 with the help of Murray. Reports Rich is alive were not for the strange behavior of his family could be discounted completely but if true point to his being taken into protective custody or the FBI wtiness relocation program. Only time will tell. The simple fact that Sputnik was seeking to cover the Rich assassination (although the journalistic competence of their staff is questionable which is the real cause of their problems) and Feinberg refused and was terminated and then became of very public interest to the FBI to continue their Russian "hacker" lies brings the whole affair to closure unless some new shocking proof pops out of the woodwork. Feinberg's lies about the Russian hackers proves to me that he is either a useless journalist or another USGov parrot. END

Wrong on Two Counts: True Answer Because He is Directly Involved With CIA/WIKILEAKS

Not funny anymore
It is actually stunning that the CIA does not even try to hide their involvement and takeover of WikiLeaks. It is like everything they do. They let everyone know they are doing it but they do not openly admit it. WikiLeaks would have never said "CIA operatives into 'OUR' overseas embassies"...

DDosed from 217.182.132.16: France where the fake Assange Twitter account is operating

Source Sent These Files Which Show Assange Collaborated w/NASA Scientist Fred Blonder, Los Alamos National Labs Scientist Michael C. Neuman 2 yrs Before his Prosecution

http://www.dataguard.no/bugtraq/1994_4/0438.html

Julian Assange is Alive, Surprise, Surprise: Download Two Videos

Assange Alive Video One

Assange Alive Video Two

COTW Demand International Rule of Law: Released 45 Minutes Before Above

Rule of Law

Citizens of the World Demand International Rule of Law PDF

Citizens of the World Demand International Rule of Law PDF WORD JPG ZIPPED

Bradley Manning is Free/Assange Most Likely Dead

http://thefifthcolumnnews.com/

RT Continues to Help the CIA Pretend Assange is Alive

http://www.kashmirmonitor.in/Details/124123/assange-hits-back-at-cia-calls-it-%E2%80%98dangerously

VOR: The Real Liquidation of the Voice of Russia

http://pastebin.com/Nn9UxK0T

http://pastebin.com/W3vynnBv

The CIA is not even hiding it. "Year Zero" means WikiLeaks is gone and the new CIA controlled WL is in its zero year. Vault 7 is either where Assange is being held or where his body is. They do not even hide the fact he was renditioned yet the sheep believe. Horrendous

So transparently trying desperately to continue their hysterical false war lies! Now China hacked Clinton the child eating monster! They are so sure you are all so stupid!

May 02 2017 Statement by John Robles II on the CIA Takeover of WL

Interesting New Graphic: CIA Openly Broadcasting its Takeover of WikiLeaks and Naming the Cell

What if one day you needed 911 and there was no answer? What if you were robbed or cheated or defrauded in some other way and you counted on the organs of justice and the courts to assist you but when you tried to seek justice they just ignored you or laughed at you or were simply not accessible to you? That is what I live with.

Now imagine the one place that you counted as your last defense and you believed was fighting for the truth was also gone? If the one last champion for truth, accountability and rule of law in a world gone mad was taken over by the same evil merciless murderers who were being exposed and then these murderers pretended to be the fighters for truth?  That is exactly what has occurred with WikiLeaks and this is the blackest news I have had to come to terms with since I realized who was behind the heinous acts of 911.

As a former WikiLeaks Associate, Friend of WikiLeaks, Media Partner and even the former hosting provider for WikiLeaks and the similar site Cryptome the end of WikiLeaks and the demise of Julian Assange is something that has touched me personally and in ways I can not even tell all of you.

I do not believe in coincidences and the physical taking out of my servers and the open theft of my property, my car and then the suspension of my Twitter account with 18K followers I am certain are all connected and behind it all are MI6, MOSSAD, the CIA and their Russian agents all over Moscow. 

I have lived on the sharp end of the CIA's stick since they revoked my citizenship in 2007 and I renounced said and also received asylum and they measures they have taken to take me out and silence me or "get" me are quite frankly unbelievable, until you consider what they are trying to protect.

What is it they are trying to protect by waging their endless war on the truth and everyone who would dare speak out? They are not trying to protect the United States, or "American lives" as David Webb was indoctrinated into believing in the Bourne films. They are not trying to protect the US mainland or US properties from attack or any other legitimate US "interests". It is much worse than that.

What they are trying to protect is the truth about the monstrous, horrendous and pure evil that the CIA has become and the monstrous evil that is everything they protect and represent. For the world is now ruled by the blackest most evil Zionist Luciferean Criminal Cabal that the history of mankind has ever seen. A creation beyond the wildest dreams of the Nazi founders of the OSS, the CIA, NATO and the European Union, the evil spawn of an inbred, insane Lord and his family bent on the destruction, enslavement and complete control of what is left of human kind. These are the monsters who carried out 911 and this is the family and the Cabal currently slaughtering millions in illegal land, resource and hegemony wars.

After 16 years of research Pizzagate was the final key to exposing who was behind 911 and how they got away with it and these creatures, the demons from hell will do anything and everything to dumb down and blind the people of the world in order to protect their lies and ill got gains. 

We can report now with almost certain confidence as to how the events of 911 were carried out but more importantly by whom. A Consortium of Black Ops, MOSSAD, CIA, Asteroids, Old Boys and of course the real masterminds, (CFR/Illuminati) Rockefeller, Kissinger, Brezhinsky, Milekowsky, Deep State Assets and Lucifer himself Lord Rothschild. They are the puppet masters, the Shadow Government and trough their Deep State assets like Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney they have gotten away with everything for the goal of greater Israel and the genocide of Arabs and other remaining "brown" peoples.

I digress as this is about what the CIA is currently doing with WikiLeaks, which is using it as an entrapment operation and to spread disinformation.

What about Vault 7 you ask? Well the Vault 7 exploits have already been discounted as being old ineffective fakes. The programs even require physical access to devices to plant them and they are outdated.

What about all of the Tweets? All of the Tweets are fakes as anyone who has followed WikiLeaks for some time can tell you that. They not only do not "feel right" but they are entirely focused on internal US political processes and figures and the CIA. They are also now exclusively in American English.

What about the account @julianassange? Well it was determined by me to have been a fake in 2012 I believe it was in a communication directly to Assange and is also Tweeting in very poor American English about topics and in a tone Assange never would have. The account was also based in France but has since hidden its real location.

Where is Assange and what about calls for his arrest? Well the Intel; we have is that Assange was taken from the Embassy on October 16th and flown out of the UK on the 18th. He was incapacitated by food delivered by Pamela Anderson which he placed in the refrigerator and only ate a couple days later on the 16th. Ecuador was forced to allow for his extraction because Julian violate the state sovereignty of the United States by causing interference in a foreign election. Since Julian was an Australian citizen he did not have the right to interfere in US elections. Had I or someone else released the Podesta e-mails there would have been nothing they could have done. But Assange grabbed the bait and unfortunately fell for it.

Approach WikiLeaks now with the knowledge that it is the CIA putting out everything and thus there is a lot you can now ascertain by what they Tweet and even more importantly what they do not Tweet. By knowing what they "want" you to believe you can understand where they are heading, what they are really doing and what they are trying to hide.

It is a horrendous lie to the entire world and must be stopped. Even if it is legal for the CIA to broadcast lies to the American people, it is not legal anywhere else and that is where we must all focus. Namely on finding an international body that will finally prosecute 911, put an end to the Cabal prosecute for genocide and war crimes and finally reign in the CIA and then liquidate it.  

Thanks for reading, stay with me for more inside revelations in the upcoming weeks and I wish you all the best.

Keep fighting for the truth.

John Anthony Robles II

Somewhere in the Moscow Region

04-28-2017 Everyone has been black since October. Fake Assange account being used as if it is real and being used to write "Op Eds". The CIA has gone insane with this charade. Washingtom Post under CIA control after paying Amazon $600 Million, WikiLeaks under control after rendition of Assange, now the CIA is pretending not to control both and both promoting CIA stories.

March 7 2017 Vault 7 Another CIA Psy Op!(I was right again!)

CIA Controlled WikiLeaks Released Fake Vault 7 Our Position Has Not Changed: No 911 or Other Bombshells - Crap

http://www.activistpost.com/2017/03/truth-vault-7-empty-government-totally-incompetent.html

February 2017 CIA Connecting to Amazon AWS, Using WAPO

https://status.aws.amazon.com/

1st: CIA Paid $600M to Amazon AWS - WaPo

http://yournewswire.com/wapo-publish-trump-disinformation/

Then: WaPo Hires John Podesta As A Columnist

http://www.activistpost.com/2017/02/wapo-hires-john-podesta-columnist-flushing-last-remaining-credibility

Does John Podesta assist CIA with Special Projects? JAR2 Concludes Progs Like MK/Finders Were Never Stopped

http://www.jar2.com/Topics/Pedo_File.html

More Disturbing Evidence Surfaces Tying Pamela Anderson to Pizzagate Satanists

February 15, 2017

Old Fake Assange Account Made in France Activated, Old Video from October and Photoshopped Photograph Being Pushed as Proof of Life. Shamefully Amateurish!

 

http://theantimedia.org/julian-assange-back-dead-twitter/ Real reliable site!

If Julian had wanted to prove he was alive he could have called RT or any media!

https://twitter.com/julianassange

I tweeted to the CIA or whoever the amateurs are behind the Op to have Julian and Kristinn text me. They know my number. I do not expect an answer.

https://twitter.com/julianassange

I challenged them again! Still no answer.

https://twitter.com/JohnARobles/status/831699357028196353

VIDEO they are trying to release as if it is new from last January 10th.

 

 

 

It is disturbing that this video has only come to light for me on the 15th of February. Key phrase "when explaining how it would be difficult to produce fake video he says there is no technology for that. However he knows as well as I that the NSA and the CIA have technology that is 25 years ahead of what we have now.

 

 

February 06, 2017 Pamela Anderson and NY Post Now Spearheading Disinformation Operation. Fake outlets like Page Six and Wonderwall used to start the media lies.

NYPOST: Hide the Fact Assange is Dead or at a Black Site

 

What are these "Yellow Press" sites? Page Six? Wonderwall?

Page Six puts out some trash, Wonderwall picks it up and then Mirror.co.uk, then it spreads all over the net and soon it is true and no one should worry or question or ask proof that Julian is truly alive and in the Embassy.

I do not have a lot of time to research and go into this right now but I can tell you Page Six is owned by the New York Post which has 144 other domains. Page Six is a "Front Operation". As I am sure the NYPost is a front or is cooperating with the CIA. Here is Page Six's registrar information:

 

 

The CIA is taking out anyone who can possibly bring down the house of cards. David Shayler, a long time friend and someone who I have discussed all of the issues surrounding Assange and Snowden with was taken off Twitter. He believes it was because of his book but I think it was also because he openly questioned the real nature of Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks in an interview shortly before he was taken down. David knows me and what I have been through so this is very distressing to me.

When the initial takedown and rendition were taking place and I was publishing the Podesta e-mails and the Pizzagate material and before my server was fried this person showed up out of nowhere to obviously threaten me into ceasing my activities. His made it clear he is high up, in charge of droning (knows about McFarland?) and warned me that I should "be safe". Mike is the name the MI6 loves to use. Probably 80% of MI6 illegals go by Mike or Michael John.

I know Julian would have never traded himself for Manning. This is all fake and almost not worth discussing. I Tweeted my opinion then this came.

What Attorney is not clear and all of the previous real attorneys always identified themselves and were people I had spoken to. They are also all out of reach.

There was a Tweet where WikiLeaks was begging for "Secret CIA Files" which I will find later which is completely uncharacteristic of Julian and WikiLeaks. The organization had terabytes of files and information that were never published and were important and never once went around begging for submissions. The same with the above Tweet. Send them so we can. The style of the delivery like with Pamela Anderson story is so glib and flippant that there is no way it could be anyone inside WikiLeaks Tweeting this crap. The Tweets and WikiLeaks have become a parody of themselves. 

Here is another example. Just as MOSSAD tried to start a "Truth Site" and failed and the CIA tried to start getting truthers to come and download their "secret documents" and failed, CIALeaks is now trying to get people to believe that there is truth to be had on NPR, which is the most government controlled media around other than the VOA, all run by the BBG and serving the interests of the CIA and the establishment. WikiLeaks never once and would never cite the NPR or CNN or agree to talk to people like Hannity or Fox News.

During the Bush days Fox News was calling on Assassinating Assange and unfortunately either most of he people forgot that or do not care.   

Finally here is another example of what could not be WikiLeaks. Julian and WikiLeaks never played or commented on internal US politics. Never. The post is ridiculous. Even everyone in the organization who was involved in Julian's attempt to enter Australian politics never posted such rubbish. 

Finally we are supposed to believe that shy intellectual embattled and eclectic Assange is "dating" Pamela Anderson who has all the intellectual class and panache of an old and tired whore well beyond her expiration date.

It is tragic what they have done to Julian as we are sure he was executed and it is also tragic that the best the US Government can do is cover it up with such an unsophisticated, crude, poorly thought out and shoddy Operation. Julian deserves better, but if they are attempting to discredit WikiLeaks they are doing a wonderful job.

There is still, in my opinion the 5% chance that Julian is still alive and the .001% chance that he is really in the Embassy and we must be demanding proof of his safety. Unfortunately they are taking all of us out and there are not enough of us left to make noise. I want to say rest in peace Julian Paul Assange but as long as there is still a chance he is alive I should not do that and should rather concentrate on gathering resonance so proof is provided he is okay. It is the least we can do. We owe him that.

I suppose now I know how the families of kidnap victims feel, hoping for the best but knowing the worst and never being allowed closure, only now the kidnappers are the "authorities" and there is absolutely no one who we can turn to.     

STATEMENT by John Robles II on supposed release of Bradley Manning:

 UPDATE! 01-18-2017 20:59 After publishing the information below this morning which effectively blew their plan they are trying to maintain cover by now saying Assange will not agree to be extradited. They have already lost the game. I had them in check and mate and now they are playing checkers.

      01-18-2017 The bottom of the 9th promised released of Bradley Manning and the associated false statements coming out from WikiLeaks which is under the control of the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States, as well as corroboratory statements by CIA Officer Edward (Greenberg) Snowden are in fact part of the continuing Limited Psychological Operation being running against truth seekers and whistleblowers, personified by CIA-Snowed-In. As a former member and associate of the WikiLeaks Organization I attempted to use every channel I had to communicate with anyone there. Resulting in two secret messages one of which is shown below.

     The Intel we had was that Julian Assange was renditioned, tortured, debriefed and summarily executed and this development only changes our opinion that Assange may still be alive and they will stage a supposed operation to make it look like he was extradited to the US not illegally as he was in October but at a later date. It is up to President Trump to order Assange transferred to Ecuador and allow him to be free. We do not believe that Obama has any good intentions whatsoever. He is a treacherous murderous tyrant who does anything to manipulate public opinion to the contrary. The latest developments only reinforce our belief that Snowden is on a deep illegal cover operation and running support for the CIA/US which every statement he makes proves. We are cautiously hopeful that Mr. Bradley will be released as promised and are changing our certainty level tht Assange is dead to 80%.  

        This dry and cold third person statement as well as others and the complete lack of proof Assange is actually okay allow us to base the above conclusion. Do not believe anything coming out of the CIA or from Obama. The fact that Mr. Manning will be released when President Trump is already in power and the timing which will allow the CIA to organize their cover-up of the illegal Assange rendition and we believe assassination are all part of a multi-layered Intelligence Operation with multiple objectives. There is no reason to rejoice here. When someone is actually freed and we know Assange was NOT executed then we will change out position.  

        Assange would never agree to be extradited to free Manning. Many people have died because of WikiLeaks and Assange never once offered to "give himself up" to save their lives or to guarantee "anyone's" freedom, which is a sad fact but true. The above statement is completely and 100% a fabrication intended to cover up a rendition that already happened. At some future time Assange will be shown to be alive and in the US or his body will be shown after he dies of an exploded tumor or some other such unforeseen medical condition. Do not trust anything they say. They are desperate professional liars covering up egregious crimes, assassinations and a complete and total disregard for international law, bent on making sure the assassination of over 4,000 people on 911 by building collapse and false flag is never uncovered. 

Again as NATO is building up forces on Russia's borders and as the NWO is desperate and in dying throws do not trust anything the Obama Administration says or ANYTHING the current CIA says!

         NOTE: Yes I was an associate of WikiLeaks with access to their files and backdoor access and communications with almost all of the principals which I think is more than evidenced by all of the journalistic work I did with them which you can still find on this site even though there was a clear attempt by forces in Russia to wipe any sign of my existence. I am saying this now because I am in a horrible situation myself and may be finished very soon. Assange mad a mistake by causing any kind of influence on a US election. As an Australian he really had not foundation to do so. As a former US citizen I have the foundation for and the responsibility to expose the illegality of the US. Assange did not understand this nuance and placed Ecuador in a situation where they had no moral ground to stand on since in reality foreign interference in a country's elections is illegal under international law even though the CIA and the US do it everyday. Assange was afraid in allowing others to release the information because he saw it as his way out of his impossible situation and a little bit because of his own vanity which is unfortunate. I will continue to pray and I ask you to pray that Julian, Kristinn, Christine and all of the good and persecuted people who were really fighting for the truth and not serving as double agents for the monsters at the CIA.   

THE WIKILEAKS FILES 

01-14-2017 JA RIP: 2 Independent Sources - 0 Contact Since Oct.

Conclusion: Julian Paul Assange has been Renditioned or is Dead 

I must underline that without physical proof or a US or Ecuadorian statement this is UNCONFIRMED

This is not WikiLeaks! Someone is Tweeting about internal US politics!

http://www.jar2.com/Topics/WikiLeaks.html

01-12-2017 TOP STORY: THIS IS NOT A DRILL! THIS IS ENDGAME! ASSANGE/WIKILEAKS ARE COMPROMISED! READY TO PUBLISH INSURANCE! NEED KEYS FOR FILES! - CODED MESSAGE FROM INSIDER

THE WIKILEAKS FILES

https://twitter.com/JohnARobles/status/819333221980717057

https://twitter.com/JohnARobles/status/817887951178895360

Tweeted to Pres. Trump to free John and Julian. It is all we can do.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/819164172781060096

https://twitter.com/JohnARobles/status/819477672837468161

2016

Coded Message

Message from Julian Assange! The picture and another message I got which I can't divulge make me 100% certain now that Julian has been compromised. There is no one left at WikiLeaks who is free and there is no one free who has the keys for opening up the insurance files. Study the pictures above, the one on the top is my coded answer.

In Response to Message:

Julian Would NEVER Troll for Documents!

DON'T BELIEVE TV. USGOV has CGI which is 25 YEARS AHEAD of what we know about. Hannity-Assange was FAKE! I OFFER THEM TO PROVE IT WASN'T

Simple Example of CGI   https://vid.me/Nqtb

Strange "Proof of Life" Photo Released After Rendition

Statement: On the 25th of December 2016 my servers were taken down in a cyber attack by a western state actor. They were physically destroyed. The actually motherboards on two servers burnt out and one monitor was sent into permanent hibernation mode. These gambits exist only for government and military actors, and the IP logs showed massive attacks coming from US controlled areas and one points to the US Embassy in Argentina for some reason. I am permanently attacked from IPs in New York, Virginia and California. We need your support to restore and improve out infrastructure

https://youtu.be/9vBWMb3iKJg

December 24th/25th My Infrastructure Was Destroyed from an IP Address in Argentina. Obama was reportedly there at the time.

Evidence Pointing to an Assange Execution in Antarctica

Fake Sean Hannity Interview Aired

DECEMBER 15, 2016

November 17th Message from Last WikiLeaks Associate in the West

Deleted Video: Julian Assange has been taken & Wikileaks Compromised

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zP2AfrwEq-0

Rendition Flight

Accepted Timeline

OCTOBER 18th ASSANGE ILLEGALLY RENDITIONED BY THE CIA

Another Message from a Reported WikiLeaks Insider on Rendition

Sounds Like a CIA Team? "WikiLeaks Task Force" Appears in October

This Photo Was Sent to Me On My Suspended Twitter Account

Remember Michael Ratner RIP

MAY-11-2016

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Michael_Ratner.html

JAR3 Sent to Zone/John's Cat Died/Assange Lawyer John Jones Dead

April-20-2016

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04/19/assange_lawyer_dies/

John Jones Died in a Strange Accident

Ratner

APRIL 18, 2016

I Wrote to Michael Ratner Asking Him to Help My Son

April-12-2016

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Michael_Ratner.html

Assange 'Arbitrarily Detained' Will Probably Die In Embassy

February 04, 2016

Assange to Leave Embassy on Friday

2015

REPOSTED: Christine Assange Pleas for her Son

07-02-2015 Assange and the Truth: A Plea by Christine Assange

Media Operations: CIA/MOSSAD Control

01-11-2015 By John Robles II Pierre Omidyar and the Subversion of States: the End is Coming Soon

CIA analyst, advisor to Ronald Reagan during the destruction of the Soviet Union and now “propagandist for the 100% Russian Government owned Sputnik/RIA Novosti/Rossiya Sevodnya/RT” Paul Craig Roberts, who now has my job and is laughing all the way to the bank as Russian taxpayers are paying him to subvert Russia, says the terrorist attack in France was a false flag and now he is supposedly a heroic whistleblower who is out of the loop exposing government crimes. Needless to say he has not called out the US for the Boston Bombing, 9-11 or the phony “War on Terror”, but France! Yes evil France. But why is Roberts blasting France. Because France is friends with Russia. Marine Intelligence content editor for RIA-Sputnik or whatever Samuel “CIA Plant” McCulloch is obviously on board on this one. The 5th column in action. Yes these are alternative media, truth seeker, outsiders! Now let me go and puke. But wait it is worse. Remember I promised a Pierre “Color Revolutions Are US” Omidyar piece, which so cozily interconnects with the 5th column here in Moscow, well read on. Another outsider.((( Anyone will tell you if you are investigating...

Fascist Sweden Continues Obeying Its US Master  

03-15-2015 Sweden Requests Assange Interview in London Before Statute of Limitations Expires  

Just as Wikileaks and Julian have been asking and offering all along. The reason Sweden has agreed now? The statute of limitations on the "crimes" he is wanted for questioning regarding will run out in August.

2014

"We have moved closer and closer to totalitarian rule..."

November 03, 2014

ASSANGE, VICTIM OF U.S. GOVERNMENT INJUSTICES

Gag Order

July 30 2014 WikiLeaks Press Release on Australian Gag Order   

Part 1) When Barrels of Guns Lifted, Truth Vanishes

Part 2) Fascists are in Power in Europe Again

7 and 11 April, 2014 07:43

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html

The US and its Allies: A Horror Show That Must Stop – John Shipton Part 1

"We will struggle with every breath and strength in our body" - John Shipton Part 2

Western Envy of Russia and Slavs Boundless John Shipton Part 3

The US and its allies: a horror show that must stop – John Shipton

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/John_Shipton.html

2013

Everything that could go wrong with WikiLeaks Party bid did

9 September, 2013 17:02

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Greg_Barns.html

Obama to be Greeted in Sweden by WikiLeaks Criminal Complaint

John Anthony Robles IIдекабрь коллаж WikiLeaks викиликс

By John Robles, 3 September, 2013 05:20 

On the 3rd of September at 10 am local time the WikiLeaks Organization will file criminal complaint in Sweden over the illegal seizure of their property on September 27th 2010.

Although you may have been hoping, as I was that someone may have finally begun to take measures to hold the United States responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace, the complaint filed by WikiLeaks may also serve as an omen for Obama of what the future has in store as more countries, individuals and organizations begin to stand up to the violations to their sovereignty and their persons by the out of control criminal cabal in Washington.

WikiLeaks says that the complaint was withheld until the trial of Bradley Manning was concluded and that it concerns information that has previously not been revealed.

The organization says that the filing is the first of four such complaints that are to be filed in different jurisdictions and is timed to be ahead of the Wednesday arrival of a U.S. delegation to Sweden that is to include U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama.

On September 27th, 2010, the authorities seized the property of WikiLeaks after they published thousands of classified U.S. intelligence documents on the war in Afghanistan.

With regard to the filings Julian Assange said: "Swedish authorities have the opportunity to demonstrate that no one, including state officials, is above the law."

With Obama’s single-handed push for another illegal war to be waged unilaterally by the United States and the world being subjected to the ongoing terror of sitting and waiting to find out whether the United States will actually go against international law and the will of the world community again and bomb another country into the stone age, the move may not seem to be ideally timed, but on the other hand, the nature of the material seized is very topical and if released would further underline the illegality of the entire U.S. war machine.

According to WikiLeaks the property seized includes:“… evidence of a war crime perpetrated by US forces in Afganistan in which more than sixty women and children were killed, known as the Garani massacre. The filing follows the revelation of unlawful FBI and US intelligence activities against WikiLeaks in Europe that have been forced onto the public record through a Parliamentary inquiry in Iceland and the Manning court martial.”

According to a press release by Wikileaks the 186-page affidavit details the ongoing and illegal attempts by the U.S. to: “…interfere with WikiLeaks' publishing and journalistic activities. Attacks such as those that WikiLeaks has endured have become a concerning trend, as exemplified by the recent abuse of the UK Terrorism Act to seize electronic devices and other materials belonging to those working on the Edward Snowden US mass surveillance revelations.”

According to Julian Assange: "Now is the time for everyone to take a stand to put an end to Obama's war against national security journalism – at home and abroad. This filing, recent court victories, and our successful intervention in the case of Edward Snowden, represent the continuing reorientation of WikiLeaks from legal defence to legal attack."

I would also add that now is the time to put an end to the illegal wars and the endless violations by the United States to international laws and conventions, especially to put an end to the continuous U.S. wars of aggression and the complete disregard for the integrity and will of the international community.

From probable cause to a hunch: illegal American surveillance – Jesselyn Radack - Part One    

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Jessylyn_Radack.html

Pre-fascist America: We’re losing the Republic - Part Two

http://cdn.ruvr.ru/download/2013/07/17/07/07132013_Robles_Radack_Part_2_Site_1.MP3

Published by VOR on July 17 2013

Stifling dissent, muzzling the press: WikiLeaks was just the beginning    

22 May, 2013 21:05  

WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange remains in Limbo in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and soon will be marking one year since he was forced to seek refuge there. Although he has never been charged with a crime the U.K. authorities have already spent almost $5 million dollars surrounding the embassy. Amidst austerity measures and economic woes being felt by citizens of the U.K. this expenditure, to persecute a whistleblower seems outrageous and even ludicrous. The U.K. has proven they will do whatever the U.S. wants, and hence Mr. Assange is in great danger indeed.

Soon it will be the one year anniversary since Julian Assange entered the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the latest revelation made by Mr. Assange to a Spanish TV program called Salvados, will probably do little to end his dangerous predicament.

During an interview which Mr. Assange granted to the program, he revealed that he had obtained unclassified, but damning, information related to himself and WikiLeaks contained in the internal communication of the United Kingdom’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), through a Data Protection Act request.

What could well be the most damning information is a communication sent by a GCHQ officer to an unidentified colleague regarding the allegations against Mr. Assange in Sweden. On the television program Mr. Assange broke the story and read one of the items he had been able to obtain which showed that the staff of one of the U.K.’s most secretive agencies, akin to the American National Security Agency (NSA), believed that Mr. Assange was being set up.

The e-mail in question, an internal unclassified communication between to members of the Signals Intelligence body from September 2012 reads as follows: "They are trying to arrest him on suspicion of XYZ … It is definitely a fit-up… Their timings are too convenient right after Cablegate."

Although the conversation regarding a “fit-up,” the U.K. term for the North American “set-up,” is damning coming from members within the intelligence community, they are not something the world does not already know. What they do show is that even though members of intelligence agencies are aware that Mr. Assange is being wrongly and groundlessly persecuted, there is nothing that can be done since the decisions are made at the top. This fact screams for the very thing Mr. Assange has come to personify, namely a need for government transparency, accountability and rule of law.

Unfortunately Mr. Assange has also shown the world what happens to whistleblowers, something no doubt needed not only at GCHQ but at almost every level of every western government. The statements also point to the fact that U. K. intelligence and the government are not in any way independent but follow orders from Washington.

In an August 2012 e-mail another GCHQ "He reckons he will stay in the Ecuadorian embassy for six to 12 months when the charges against him will be dropped, but that is not really how it works now, is it? He's a fool... Yeah... A highly optimistic fool.”

Christine Assange said it best a year ago when she stated to the AAP: "What the US wants, the US gets from its allies, regardless of if it's legal or if it's ethical or in breach of human or legal rights." We might also add regardless of the fact that the entire world knows the allegations in Sweden are trumped up and that they are just that, allegations. It is important to remember that Mr. Assange has not been charged or tried for any crime.

The U.K.’s Independent reported that a GCHQ spokesman stated: "We acknowledge that some of these comments were inappropriate but emphasize that no decisions were taken by GCHQ on the basis of these comments, nor was any reliance placed on them. We have reminded staff of the importance of professional behavior at all times."

Overall this is just another example of how far the U.S. and its surrogate the U.K. will go to get a whistleblower who exposed the crimes and illegality of government actions. The actions of the authorities show that the people and even the government have no rights, the only people with rights are those at the top who are controlling things and who are guilty of the highest of crimes.

The length they are going to and the absolute unilateral way the authorities, against the public’s interest and trust, are conducting the persecution of Mr. Assange can only be underlined by the unbelievable amount of resources they are spending surrounding the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. To date the U.K. authorities have spent over $4.5 million of the taxpayers money to ensure that Mr. Assange does not manage to get out of the embassy and board a plane to Ecuador.

 It can only be a criminal state that would go to such extreme measures to attempt to go after a whistleblower. It can only be a criminal state that would not go after criminals who have been exposed by that whistleblower, and it could only be a criminal state, or in this case its surrogate, that would continue to trample on the basic human rights of an innocent man.

WikiLeaks Special Project K: The Kissinger Cables go live

8 April, 2013 07:14

The anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks has gone live with another huge release called the Kissinger Cables, which are part of an even greater effort named the WikiLeaks Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD). Wikileaks says it is the world's largest searchable collection of United States confidential, or formerly confidential, diplomatic communications and that as of April 8, 2013 it holds 2 million records comprising approximately 1 billion words.

Regarding the release WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange stated: "The collection covers US involvements in, and diplomatic or intelligence reporting on, every country on Earth. It is the single most significant body of geopolitical material ever published."

According to WikiLeaks: “the Kissinger Cables comprise more than 1.7 million US diplomatic records for the period 1973 to 1976, including 205,901 records relating to former US Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger. Dating from January 1, 1973 to December 31, 1976 they cover a variety of diplomatic traffic including cables, intelligence reports and congressional correspondence. They include more than 1.3 million full diplomatic cables and 320,000 originally classified records. These include more than 227,000 cables classified as CONFIDENTIAL and 61,000 cables classified as SECRET. Perhaps more importantly, there are more than 12,000 documents with the sensitive handling restriction NODIS or 'no distribution,' and more than 9,000 labeled EYES ONLY.”

At around 700 million words, the Kissinger Cables collection is approximately five times the size of WikiLeaks' Cablegate. The raw PDF data is more than 380 Gigabytes in size and is the largest WikiLeaks publication to date.

WikiLeaks' says the significant revelations will include US involvements with fascist dictatorships, particularly in Latin America, under Franco's Spain (including about the Spanish royal family) and in Greece under the regime of the Colonels.

The documents also contain hourly diplomatic reporting on the 1973 war between Israel, Egypt and Syria (the "Yom Kippur war"). The Kissinger Cables provide unparalleled access to journalists and the general public.

Most of the records were reviewed by the United States Department of State's systematic 25-year declassification process. At review, the records were assessed and either declassified or kept classified with some or all of the metadata records declassified. Both sets of records were then subject to an additional review by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Once believed to be releasable, they were placed as individual PDFs at the National Archives as part of their Central Foreign Policy Files collection.

The CIA and other agencies have attempted to reclassify or withhold sections of the US National Archives. Detailed minutes of US State Department meetings show that these attempts, which originated under the Bush II administration, have continued on through until at least 2009. A 2006 analysis by the US National Security Archives, an independent non-governmental research institute and library located at George Washington University, found that 55,000 pages had been secretly reclassified.

The censorship of the US National Archives was thrown into stark relief in November last year when the Archive censored all searches for 'WikiLeaks' from its records.

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks' publisher, said: "The US administration cannot be trusted to maintain the history of its interactions with the world. Fortunately, an organisation with an unbroken record in resisting censorship attempts now has a copy."

Voice of Russia, WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks publishes 1.7 million fresh US secret cables

The whistle blowing WikiLeaks website has made public1.7 million fresh US Intelligence and State Department cables for 1973-1976, mostly telegrams, reports and correspondence.

According to a statement posted on the site of the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange of Australia, part of the cables has been declassified, while the other part has been marked as “not for distribution”.

A juicy scandal around WikiLeaks flared up after the site published, in November 2010, secret US diplomatic cables, presenting Washington’s policy in a poor light.

The US accused Assange of divulging official secrets and espionage, so he’s been compelled to hide in Ecuador’s Embassy in London since June last year. Assange is facing death penalty in the United States.

Sweden’s case against Assange is falling apart - Part 1 Samantha Castro

5 April, 16:50, 2013

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Sam_Castro.html

Assange Supported by Swedish Justice

4 April, 2013 19:04

Swedish Supreme Court Justice Stefan Lindskog made a surprising appearance at University of Adelaide and spoke to an audience about the ongoing case of Julian Assange. He spoke in support of Assange, WikiLeaks and even Bradley Manning, but he also went into the allegations against Assange in Sweden, which is something almost unheard of as the case is ongoing. Was this an innocent lecture or a sinister political gambit? It will be up to Australians to decide.

Under normally accepted standards and rules of jurisprudence it is very unusual for a member of the prosecuting legal establishment to speak in public regarding the details of an ongoing case, but the Swedish Justice apparently has got away with it because he spoke in a foreign country, Australia, and is not presiding over the case.

Julian Assange was quoted as saying the stunt was “absolutely outrageous” no doubt taken aback by the sheer deviation from the norm. He may also be worried about the possible negative impact the event could have on his case and possibly his political campaign for Senate.

Greg Barns, the President of Australian Lawyers Alliance, and the head of Julian’s campaign, who I spoke to earlier in the week told the Sydney Morning Herald: "That a Swedish supreme court judge thinks this is acceptable tends to confirm the fears people have about the impartiality and robustness of the Swedish judicial system.” And;”It gives great currency to the belief that Mr. Assange's case in Sweden has been heavily politicized."

In a tweet WikiLeaks said: “The head of Swedish Supreme Court campaigning on a case they expect to judge with $ from the embassy in the run up to an election", portraying the event as part of a conspiracy.

Despite many words in support of WikiLeaks and the case of Assange and even Bradley Manning, the talk by the judge was troubling on several fronts, not only the most obvious, the fact that it took place at all, but also in the context of the current situation surrounding Assange and WikiLeaks.

First let’s look at what Justice Stefan Lindskog said in support of Assange and Bradley Manning, with regard to extradition: "Basically, I think there are some misunderstandings, especially when it comes to the issue of extradition, extradition shall not be granted when alleged crimes are military or political in nature.”

With regard to leaking classified information: “What is classified under US law is probably not classified under Swedish law, and enemies to the US may not be enemies to Sweden.”

With regard to Assange: “At the end of the day Assange will be thought of as someone who made public certain pieces of information”, and “… the Wikileaks’ leaks were good for society and should not be punished. The good made by leakage of such information cannot be underestimated. It should never be a crime to make known the crime of a state.”

Justice Lindskog spoke about Bradley Manning: “The release of classified information was for the benefit of mankind, especially a secret combat video in Iraq that showed the American crew mowing down a group of civilians and a Reuters photographer.” And, “I hope Mr. Manning will have a fair trial.

That is all nice and good and positive and on the surface it would appear Sweden is attempting to show that it is not the U.S. lapdog many would claim it to be, but there is a much more sinister side to this that few are seeing.

In a video posted on the website of the University of Adelaide, since taken down, at about the 25 minute mark, Justice Lindskog speaks in surprising detail about the lurid sex-capades Julian is accused of. One point is clear there was no rape involved and all of the accusations involve the proper usage or non-usage of condoms, yet putting this out to the Australian public, again in a forum where Julian is not allowed to give his side of the story is an egregious offense against Assange.

There can be no doubt that Assange has political enemies worldwide and in Australia these include people from the Prime Minister Julia Gillard on down. These are people who will most likely do anything to stop Assange from winning a seat in the country’s senate.

Surely airing details of the sex antics of Assange is in bad taste to say the least, and had the case taken place in Sweden Justice Lindskog could have been accused of attempting to poison the jury pool, but having taken place in Australia, it might be said that he was attempting to poison the “voter pool”.

Whether cutting the Assange campaign off at the pass was the Judge’s intention or not is yet to be seen, the information may have been known to the public and it may be brushed aside. What effect it will have depends on the character of the Australian electorate, will any hint of scandal send them running as Americans do, or will they be happy to have someone in office with an active sex life, or perhaps they will decide what he does in his bedroom is his business as the case should be.

Another possible sinister motivations with all of the kind words and such may be Sweden’s own attempt to gain political capital and effect the case, so that Julian is allowed to be sent to Sweden, it may all be a ruse, which might be more likely as not to be the case, as the Swedish judiciary could have come out years ago in support of Julian and allowed him to give his side of the story a million times over.

Assange officially files to run for Australian Senate - By John Robles II

14 February, 23:22  

Julian Assange, the most famous whistleblower and fighter for transparency in the world, something that has made him enemy number one of the United States of America, has officially filed documents with the Australian Electoral Commission to run for a senate seat in the Australian state of Victoria in the upcoming September federal elections. The fight proves to be a test not only for Mr. Assange but also for the Australian people who now will have a choice for real positive change in their country or to keep the status quo. Will he win? Chances are good.

Well it is official! Julian Assange has now formally filed an application to run for a seat in the Australian Senate in the upcoming September 14th federal elections. His formal application was filed for him in Melbourne with the Australian Electoral Commission on Tuesday by his supporters and officially he will be running for a seat in the Australian state of Victoria.

Mr. Assange will be running on a ticket for the newly created WikiLeaks Party which has yet to be formally registered with the Australian Electoral Commission, but which already has staff, is active and has two internet domain names registered in the name of the deputy national party president, Tim Neal, who according to media reports live in Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia 264 kilometers from Melbourne.

Mr. Assange’s application was apparently turned in by his father, John Shipton, who is a well-know architect from Sydney and who has been one of the principle organizers of the new party which already has a national council consisting of 10 people who are all supporters of WikiLeaks or close friends of Mr. Assange.

With regard to the filing The Age quotes Mr. Shipton as having said that the move was; “a first step' in a political campaign that would focus on the democratic requirement of truthfulness from government''.

According to the Wikileaks discussion forum Mr. Shipton told the Associated Press in Australia that he thought there was lot of support for Julian and even more support for what Julian stands for. "The party stands for what Julian espouses transparency and accountability in government and of course human rights."

There were concerns that Mr. Assange’s asylum claim might be hindered by him running for a political seat in Australia, but in an interview with the Voice of Russia, his American lawyer, Michael Ratner, said his running will in no way affect the asylum he was granted by Ecuador.

When I spoke with Mr. Ratner I asked him if Mr. Assange would be able to fulfill the duties of the office, which will be filled by an appointee chosen by Mr. Assange if he is not able to physically take the seat, as has been stated by his supporters, and he stated that the situation is a not clear due to the fact that, as he put it, Australia is a “lap dog for America”, and may attempt to send Mr. Assange to America where he faces life in prison or even execution, for publishing material that was embarrassing to the United States and which exposed war crimes and secret wars being carried out in contravention of international laws and treaties.

Mr. Ratner stated that since Australian is an English Commonwealth country Mr. Assange may be granted some kind of immunity which might allow him to finally leave the Ecuadorian Embassy, where he has been forced to seek refuge out of fears for his life.

Many American politicians, government officials, public figures and pundits have openly called for Mr. Assange’s assassination. Rather than investigations into the facts uncovered by WikiLeaks.

The fears which Mr. Assange has are very real and exist to this day, a fact that was underlined in a recent interview with William Blum on the Voice of Russia, who said that it was a given that Assange was on US Government assassination lists and who in his words has, “… a missile with his name on it, inside a drone with his name on it!”

I contacted WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnnson and Christine Assange for comment on the Senate bid however they refrained from commenting or have not answered requests for comments, directing me instead to Samantha Castro the Co-Director of the WikiLeaks Australian Citizen’s Alliance, an interview with whom will be available soon on the Voice of Russia.

Julian Assange and the WikiLeaks Party are bravely continuing their fight to end the illegal and criminal conduct of government and fighting for transparency, time will tell if the Australian people also support such noble ideals.

"I think there's a lot of support for Julian and even more support for what Julian stands for," Mr Shipton told the Australian Associated Press, ARS Technica reports. "The party stands for what Julian espouses—transparency and accountability in government and of course human rights."

Originally here  http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_14/Assange-officially-files-to-run-for-Australian-Senate/

Assange Running for Office May Affect his Asylum

30 January, 23:04  

Julian Assange has decided to run for public office in his native Australia. This information came out in a Tweet by WikiLeaks and has been confirmed in statements to the press by Kristinn Hrafnsson, the official spokesperson for WikiLeaks, and Christine Assange, mother of Julian Assange.

According to the WikiLeaks Twitter page and media reports Mr. Assange will be running for Senate on a WikiLeaks Party ticket. According to Australian media Assange stated that plans to register a WikiLeaks Party are ''significantly advanced,'' and that "… a number of very worthy people admired by the Australian public have indicated their availability to stand for election on a party ticket.”

In an interview with Australia’s Fairfax Media Assange said he meets the Australian requirements to “register as an overseas elector in either New South Wales or Victoria and will soon be making a strategic decision about which state he would be a senate candidate for.” Whether the public will support his candidacy is another question altogether but according to Assange he is encouraged by a number of Australian polls, which had been conducted over the previous years and which he says show a high-level of unwavering support for himself and WikiLeaks. The key question will be if that support can be translated into actual votes in the polling booth from an Australian Electorate that has been fed a steady stream of anti-Assange propaganda for years.

Some might argue that this is just another media stunt by Assange to cause another media frenzy, with the very important question be raised as to how he will be able to serve the Australian people, if elected, and he is unable to return to Australia. According to Fairfax Media Assange said if that is the case a nominee would occupy his Senate seat.

Other questions arise as to how running for political office in Australia might affect his political asylum claims under international treaties and how Ecuador will react to the fact that someone who they are protecting wishes to run for public office in a country where he is supposedly unwelcome and would be in danger.

The level of danger to Ecuador and to the Ecuadorian President, caused by their sheltering Assange, was once again underlined by Mr. William Blum, a famous American writer and academic, in an interview I conducted with him forthe Voice of Russia. Mr. Blum said he was not surprised by President Correa’s claims that the CIA was planning to assassinate him before the presidential elections next month and that sheltering Assange was by itself enough reason for the CIA to assassinate him.

Mr. Blum said: “The CIA attempts to assassinate people for much less reasons than that. Assange is the public enemy No. 1 in America. The U.S. is obsessed with him and they are afraid that he will be issuing the release of more classified documents so they’d really like to put him out of the way, if they can.”

There are further questions that arise with the fact that Assange and WikiLeaks associates have stated in the past that; Australia has done nothing to protect Assange and that he would be handed over to the Americans for prosecution if he set foot on Australian soil.

Whether him winning a seat to public office will provide him with immunity from persecution and prosecution is also questionable and one might contend that Assange would be better of concentrating his efforts on perhaps running for office in the country that has granted him asylum and has been protecting him even though it has put that country’s president in the proverbial “cross-hairs of a CIA drone”.

According to Fairfax Media, Assange's biological father, John Shipton, is the person on the ground organizing the formation of the Australian WikiLeaks Party, and has already drafted the party's constitution which is now under legal review.

For the party to be registered with the Australian Electoral Commission they would need "... the confirmation of 500 members who are listed on the electoral roll", says Fairfax Media.

As Assange remains holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London it is not clear how he would be able to carry out his plans but perhaps he has several cards up his sleeve.

According to Mr. Blum Mr. Assange might prefer to be cautious and avoid open spaces as: “There is a drone somewhere with his name on it, and if he walks around in the world and he is not in the midst of a big city, he’s a marked man. There’s a rocket with his name on it inside of a drone with his name on it.”

Whether refugee Assange becomes Senator Assange, only time will tell.

  2012

Info-War adapt and regroup: WikiLeaks/Freedom of the Press Foundation

17 December 2012, 16:10   

Info-War adapt and regroup: WikiLeaks and Freedom of the Press Foundation

The world wide information war continues and righteous, true proponents of truth, transparency and accountability, embattled by the arbitrary extra-judicial persecution being meted out on them by a corrupt out-of-control system that is attempting to subjugate the entire planet, are adapting, regrouping, forming unions, expanding and strengthening their positions. In this regardWikiLeaks has joined up with a new organization called the Freedom of the Press Foundation which will help to advance and protect those who are fighting for the truth to be heard.

In reality it is a war pitting good against evil that has ramifications for all of mankind and for the sake of humanity, good must prevail. 

Mark my words, make no doubt and take heed, we are at war. Not a physical war in the standard meaning of the word, when two honorable armies stand face to face on the battlefield and proceed to slaughter each other, nor in the new meaning of the word, when men in bunkers half a world away use drones to wantonly target and obliterate anything they please in a poor country on the other side of the planet, but a war of words, an information war that threatens the freedom and liberty of every human being on earth.

The battles are taking place on different fronts but the war is of epic, global and even biblical proportion. The war has pitted the people of the world, on the whole humans who are becoming servile subjects eking out a parsimonious existence, against the all-powerful and all-knowing governments that have enslaved them yet were supposed to be their servants. That is not a dramatization, but in reality, an understated conclusion as to what has become of the world.

Some of the fronts in this war include areas such as: intrusive surveillance and monitoring equipment and regimes made possible by the brilliant advances in technology during the last twenty years, the manipulation and control of financial institutions and markets whereby financial power is guaranteed to those controlling the equation, an iron-fisted, extra-judicial, illegal and out-of-control-police-state which along with the western military complex is expanding globally and lastly every interface you have for obtaining information about what is really going on in the world.

The goal of the all powerful unilateral self-serving super state is to control and subject you so you are passively pliant, dumbed down and present no threat whatsoever to their illegal, corrupt and self-serving abuse and holding of power.

In the information war we have huge governments with vast unlimited resources and media which they control and which goose-steps strictly in line with the super-government against independent and principled alternative media, state run non-commercial independent media, journalists, bloggers, Hacktivists, whistle-blowers and even members of their own security apparatus fighting against the criminal state from within.

One of those alternative media outlets is WikiLeaks, which has brought to the mainstream the fight for freedom of information and calls for accountability. As we know WikiLeaks is embattled and suffering after more than two years under an extra-judicial banking blockade and with its public face forced into hiding in an embassy in London. The super-global-government (meaning that of the United States of America) has not backed down from its relentless persecution of these champions of information freedom, but has continued their endless onslaught on journalistic freedom on all fronts.

According to a press release from WikiLeaks, today, in answer to that a new source of information has been launched called the Freedom of the Press Foundation or FPF. The FPF is an initiative of Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) co-founder John Perry Barlow, former Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, actor John Cusack and others, and will crowd-source fundraising and support for organizations or individuals under attack for publishing the truth. It aims to promote "aggressive, public-interest journalism focused on exposing mismanagement, corruption and law-breaking in government". This is part of WikiLeaks declaration of war on the elitist US controlled banking system.

According to WikiLeaks the blockade has stopped 95 per cent of contributions to WikiLeaks which has been forced to use cash reserves, which they say amounted to more than one million dollars in 2010 to under a thousand dollars by December 2012.

The new initiative, combined with a recent victory in Germany, means contributions to WikiLeaks now have tax-deductible status throughout the United States and Europe.

From his refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London Julian Assange said: “We've fought this immoral blockade for two long years. We smashed it in the courts. We smashed it in the Treasury. We smashed it in France. We smashed it in Germany. And now, with strong and generous friends who still believe in First Amendment rights, we're going to smash it in the United States as well.” When asked what will happen if the financial giants blockade the FPF he responded: "Let Visa, Mastercard, PayPal and all the rest block the independent Freedom of the Press Foundation. Let them demonstrate to the world once again who they really are!"

According to the foundation in a press release from WikiLeaks; “The Foundation's first 'bundle' will crowd-source funds for WikiLeaks, the National Security Archive, The UpTake and MuckRock News. Donors will be able to use a slider to set how much of their donation they wish each organization to receive and can donate to WikiLeaks using their credit cards. The Foundation holds 501(c) charitable status, so donations are tax-deductible in the U.S. Other courageous press organizations will be added as time goes by.”

John Perry Barlow, a board member of the new FPF says they aim to achieve more than just crowd-sourced fundraising: "We hope it makes a moral argument against these sorts of actions. But it could also be the basis of a legal challenge. We now have private organizations with the ability to stifle free expression. These companies have no bill of rights that applies to their action – they only have terms of service."

According to WikiLeaks: “Initiatives such as the Freedom of the Press Foundation are vital to sustain a truly independent free press. In heavily redacted European Commission documents recently released by WikiLeaks, MasterCard Europe admitted that U.S. Senate Homeland Security Chairman Joseph Lieberman and Congressman Peter T. King were both directly involved in instigating the blockade.”

Journalist Glenn Greenwald who is also on the FPF board stated: "What possible political value can the internet serve, or journalism generally, if the U.S. government, outside the confines of law, is empowered − as it did here − to cripple the operating abilities of any group which meaningfully challenges its policies and exposes its wrongdoing? That the U.S. government largely succeeded in using extra-legal and extra-judicial means to cripple an adverse journalistic outlet is a truly consequential episode: nobody, regardless of one's views on WikiLeaks, should want any government to have that power."

With the 3 days to go until the release of Tyler by Anonymous, the passing of more intrusive internet standards by the US on a global level and the continued cracking down on civil liberties in the US and the expansion of those policies to the world: the information war continues and the epic battle against the illegal-corrupt-criminal-usurpers-of-power-masquerading-as-a-righteous-government sees no end in sight.

US Right-Wing Censoring World Media - WikiLeaks    

27 November 2012, 19:30   

In a statement released by WikiLeaks Julian Assange said: “There is no sovereignty without economic sovereignty. Hard-right elements in the United States have been able to pressure VISA and MasterCard, who together hold monopoly over the European market, into introducing a blockade that the U.S. Treasury has rightly rejected. These unaccountable elements are directly interfering in the political and economic freedoms of EU consumers and are setting a precedent for political censorship of the world's media.”

According to sources in WikiLeaks and in a press release on Tuesday, the primary movers behind the extrajudicial banking blockade against WikiLeaks are extremist members of the US right-wing. Documents obtained by WikiLeaks from MasterCard Europe show that Senator Joseph Lieberman and Congressman Peter T. King were in contact with MasterCard in the US and bragged of being behind WikiLeaks service being blocked by such sites as Amazon.

Julian Assange spoke out on the matter, underlining how seriously illegal moves by the US are interfering with WikiLeaks and how they are infringing on the sovereignty of the world: “There is no sovereignty without economic sovereignty. It is concerning that hard-right elements in the United States have been able to pressure VISA and MasterCard, who together hold monopoly over the European market, into introducing a blockade that the US Treasury has rightly rejected. These unaccountable elements are directly interfering in the political and economic freedoms of EU consumers and are setting a precedent for political censorship of the world's media.”

WikiLeaks’ latest press release states that Senator Lieberman’s efforts included attempting to pass the SHIELD Act and advocating for the prosecution of the New York Times for espionage in connection with WikiLeaks' releases. Representative Peter King, the chair of the House Committee on Homeland Security, attempted to have WikiLeaks designated as a foreign terrorist organization, list WikiLeaks staff as “enemy combatants” and enter the organization on a US Treasury blacklist, further damaging the organization financially. Having failed to manipulate US law for their own ends, the pair then proceeded on a campaign of extra-judicial measures to hurt WikiLeaks any way they could and used Visa and MasterCard to do so.

Although the European Commission is not planning to open a formal investigation of VISA, MasterCard and American Express’ violations against DataCell, according to a 16-page preliminary decision, on the 19th of November 2012, the European Parliament did take a step in the right direction towards protecting Europeans from external infringement on their economic sovereignty. Article 32 of the November resolution by the European Parliament directs the European Commission to prevent the arbitrary manipulation of credit card payments, such as that by Lieberman and King, which damage businesses and organizations, in particular WikiLeaks.

WikiLeaks also reveals that Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard intentionally misled the European Commission by making statements that the publication of diplomatic cables was "illegal", something not supported by an investigation by the Australian Federal Police. Subsequently the Australian Senate passed a resolution demanding Gillard retract the false statement, something she yet to do.

Documents obtained by WikiLeaks from MasterCard reveal the company’s willingness to circumvent international law for their own political ends and show that the company holds right-wing views despite the widespread global condemnation of the US illegal resource invasions. MasterCard documents released by WikiLeaks state: “It is evident that any affiliation with an organization causing damage to the national interests of several nations involved in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq... will be extremely damaging for the public perception of MasterCard”.

Not only is the extra-judicial blockade of WikiLeaks illegal under European Union Article 19, international law and the laws of countries where WikiLeaks financial support mechanisms are located, including Iceland but it has been condemned by organizations and individuals worldwide including the United Nations Special Rapporteur of Freedom of Speech, the New York Times Editorial Board, the German foundation Wau Holland Stiftung, and news publications and organizations worldwide.

According to WikiLeaks number 2 Kristinn Hrafnsson, in several conversations I had with him, WikiLeaks’ is not only fighting for itself but for the freedom of all press and news organizations. Kristinn Hrafnsson says WikiLeaks is hurting bad but the fight will go on.

Gillard's Wikileaks Comments Defamatory Greg Barns President Australian Lawyers Alliance   

13 October 2012, 16:46  

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Greg_Barns.html

WikiLeaks’s Possible Case Against Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard Scott Ludlam - Senator  

12 October 2012, 14:38  

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Scott_Ludlum.html

Is Assange Running for the Office of US President? Wikileaks exclusive press release  By John Robles

Is Assange running for the office of US President? Wikileaks exclusive press release

3 October 2012, 11:00  

Once again being threatened by the US Pentagon, which is set on advancing its own extra-territorial agenda and subjugating the world to the US’ will, Wikileaks and Julian Assange have decided to fight back against the US’ unilateral stance that the entire planet and all of its citizens are under its jurisdiction. Wikileaks has decided to do so during the US Presidential elections, offering the US electorate the choice of more of the same, or supporting the truth, for it is only the truth that can bring about change.

Julian Assange and Wikileaks have decided to intervene in the US presidential elections offering the American electorate and the world real “Hope” and what may be their only chance for real “change”. Not the “Change We Can Believe In” or the “Hope” of Obama’s last presidential campaign, we won’t even mention the hopelessness being offered by the Republicans, but a real chance to change the policies and the actions of the US government by exposing what they would rather the world did not know.

Is Julian running for the office of US President? Can an Australian, trapped in an Ecuadorian Embassy in the United Kingdom, run for the presidency of the United States? The answer is no and no. It is much more complicated and actually much more honest than that.

Wikileaks and Julian Assange have been the subject of US persecution for so long that some of us may forget a very simple fact that for some reason has been lost in the global debate. The US has no right whatsoever, not now and not ever, to go after anyone at Wikileaks. The fact of the matter is quite simple, the United States of America has no jurisdiction over anyone involved in the case they have fabricated against Wikileaks, no matter how they want to stifle freedom of speech and the press, and no matter how much they want to portray it as a crime that the malfeasance and war-crimes of the US Government are revealed, they simply do not have jurisdiction. Period, end of discussion.

Wikileaks and Julian Assange have finally decided to attack this point head on are now placing, as they put it: “the Obama administration within our jurisdiction.” Wikileaks claims that being subjected to laws without representation is an injustice to Americans, which is exactly what the US has been attempting to do to Wikileaks.

Nowhere have I seen in the public debate questions being raised as to how in the world can the US have the unmitigated gall to go after someone for violating some archaic internal US law like the Espionage Act of 1917 when that person and his organization have absolutely nothing to do with the United States and when their actions were not committed on US soil.

The United States has long ago stepped way outside of its own bounds and has unilaterally decided that the entire planet is under its jurisdiction. We could ask this question about almost anything the US does unilaterally anywhere in the world. For example in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Libya, in Syria and in even here in Russia, what right does the United States of America have in dictating to the world what it should do? Under what right and under what jurisdiction does the US have to tell Syria who their president is? Under what right does the US have to fund uprisings all over the world and assassinate the leaders of sovereign nations, or for that matter even a Taliban warlord in Afghanistan?

The US has no right, and every unilateral invasion of a sovereign country, and every single drone strike and every single person that the US and its military adventures around the planet have killed are crimes against all humanity. The US has never had the right under any law but their own to carry out any of these things.

Sadly the world has grown accustomed to be subjugated and dictated what to do by the United States of America. This has been going on for decades but the fact is that people are beginning to wake up, slowly but surely, and they are beginning to realize that they are being subjugated and their countries and rights are being taken over by the US. This is embodied by what has happened to Julian Assange and those at Wikileaks and many others the world over, including yours truly.

The United States arrogantly and imperialistically expects you and I, citizen of the world, to bend to their will and do their bidding and allow them to do what they like in your country and in any country they please, and if they can not do so openly they will use whatever tools they have at their disposal to meet their goals. For Wikileaks this means keeping quiet and according to the Pentagon destroying documents the US Government does not want anyone to see.

The arrogance and utter insanity of it all was underlined last Friday, September 28th, when the US Pentagon again threatened WikiLeaks. According to Julian Assange: “Pentagon spokesman George Little demanded WikiLeaks destroy its publications, including the Iraq War logs which revealed the killings of over 100,000 civilians.”Assange also says that Little told him “… continued possession by WikiLeaks of classified information belonging to the United States Government represents a continuing violation of law”.

A “continuing violation of the law”? When did US law apply to extra-territorial cases? When did the entire planet and the 8,500,000,000 or so citizens of the world who are not Americans get together and decide that they would abide and adhere to US laws and allow the US to arrest, kidnap, incarcerate, torture, prosecute and persecute them as it saw fit? I must have missed that one.

We saw this extra-judicial, extra-territorial arrogance applied to others, for example Victor Bout and Constantin Yaroshenko, Russians entrapped in and kidnapped from, third countries and we see this every day in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan and anywhere else the US is fulfilling the kill orders of their “Commander in Chief”. The man who received a Nobel Peace Prize yet signs a daily “kill list”.

Wikileaks has thus entered the US election process to ask US citizens and the citizens of the world to support them economically and politically and support their efforts at getting the truth out. Yes the truth, something that the US Government has long claimed to have a monopoly on as well.

According to Wikileaks the US “Democratic” Party is “… building a state within a state, placing nearly 5 million Americans under the national security clearance system. It has classified more documents than any previous administration, classifying even the process used to decide who will live and who will be killed. The U.S. administration hurtles towards dystopia: secret laws, secret process, secret budgets, secret bailouts, secret killings, secret mass spying, secret drones and secret detention without charge. The collapse of the Soviet Union could have led to the withdrawal of the security state but without moral competition from another system, it has grown unchecked to influence almost every American. Four more years in the same direction cannot be tolerated.”

Julian Assange failed to mention one thing, and this is the most important fact, the growth and malignancy of the US system has affected and influenced not only “almost every American” but also most of the world in one way or another. Should this unilateral “global-judge-jury-and-executioner” be allowed to continue on the path of global domination and subjugation of the entire planet? The answer is no.

Julian Assange has also once again exposed Obama’s hypocrisy stating that it was Wikileaks’ revelations that: “… forced the U.S. out of the Iraq War by exposing the killing of Iraqi children  causing the Iraqi government to strip the U.S. military of immunity, which forced the U.S. withdrawal.” This is backed up not only by the Afhgan War Files but also by the Global Intelligence Files .

Assange also says, and this completely flies in the face of all US claims: “It was WikiLeaks’ revelations and pan-Arab activists, not the Obama administration that helped to trigger the Arab Spring. While WikiLeaks was exposing dictators from Yemen to Cairo, Vice President Joseph Biden was calling Hosni Mubarak a democrat, Hillary Clinton was calling his government “stable”  and the U.S. administration was colluding with Saleh to bomb his own peo ple.”

So as Julian Assange and millions of others now believe: if you want real change in Washington it doesn’t matter what party you vote for. What is truly important is that you support the truth, for as a wise man once said; “It is the truth that shall set you free.”

The URL for the WikiLeaks Donate 2012 campaign:www.wikileaks.org/donate2012

Voice of Russia publishes WikiLeaks’ press statement:

WikiLeaks Press Statement  - WikiLeaks enters U.S. election campaign

Last Friday, on Sept 28, the Pentagon again threatened WikiLeaks. Pentagon spokesman George Little demanded WikiLeaks destroy its publications, including the Iraq War logs which revealed the killings of over 100,000 civilians. Little said “continued possession by WikiLeaks of classified information belonging to the United States government represents a continuing violation of law”. The Pentagon also again “warned Mr. Assange and WikiLeaks” against “soliciting” material from U.S. military whistleblowers.

In response WikiLeaks has decided to intervene in the U.S. election campaign.

The United States government claims Mr. Assange and the WikiLeaks organization are within its jurisdiction. In reply, we place the Obama administration within our jurisdiction. All American school children are taught that being subject to laws without representation is an injustice. This is the backbone of the American Revolution. We claim our representation and now initiate a campaign to transform Democratic and Republican votes into economic and political support for WikiLeaks and its 1st Amendment values. This election day, do not vote for the Republican or Democratic parties. Instead, cast the only vote that matters; vote with your wallet - vote for WikiLeaks.

The Democratic Party promised to open government. But instead it is building a state within a state, placing nearly 5 million Americans under the national security clearance system. It has classified more documents than any previous administration, classifying even the process used to decide who will live and who will be killed. The U.S. administration hurtles towards dystopia: secret laws, secret process, secret budgets, secret bailouts, secret killings, secret mass spying, secret drones and secret detention without charge. The collapse of the Soviet Union could have led to the withdrawal of the security state but without moral competition from another system, it has grown unchecked to influence almost every American. Four more years in the same direction cannot be tolerated.

The Obama administration continues to conduct a “whole of government” investigation of “unprecedented scale and nature” into WikiLeaks and its people. It has fuelled the extrajudicial banking blockade against the organization and has held an alleged WikiLeaks source, Bradley Manning, in conditions that the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture, Juan Mendez, found amounted to torture. Mr. Assange has been formally found to be a political refugee, but U.S. ambassadors warned countries like Switzerland not to offer him asylum. President Obama has called Bradley Manning guilty before trial and Vice President Biden has named Julian Assange a 'hi tech terrorist'. The Obama-Biden campaign brags of having prosecuted twice as many national security whistleblowers as “all previous administrations combined” . This is not acceptable.

Politicians always say your decision, come election-time, will determine the future. But as has been seen with the Obama administration, deciding on who gets into formal office is not a meaningful choice, because when you vote your party into government you also vote the government, including all its agencies and friends, into your party. At the same time, parties taking office are concurrently eliminated as the restraining voice of opposition.

But there is another option.

Government agencies and corporations know that knowledge is power. That is why they spend literally billions to keep their plans and actions secret from all of us.

They know that together we can force them to act differently.

It was WikiLeaks’ revelations - not the actions of president Obama - that forced the U.S. administration out of the Iraq War. By exposing the killing of Iraqi children WikiLeaks directly activated the Iraqi government to strip the U.S. military of immunity, which in turn forced the U.S. withdrawal .

It was WikiLeaks’ revelations and pan-Arab activists, not the Obama administration that helped to trigger the Arab Spring . While WikiLeaks was exposing dictators from Yemen to Cairo , Vice President Joseph Biden was calling Hosni Mubarak a democrat, Hillary Clinton was calling his government “stable” and the U.S. administration was colluding with Saleh to bomb his own people.

And it was WikiLeaks’ revelations, not the White House that led to the reform of the largest children's hospital network in the United States.  

Last year, the Pentagon got $662 billion  for its 2012 war chest. For WikiLeaks to continue its work to bring transparency to powerful institutions through the mass publication of leaks with the greatest potential to lead to more just forms of governance, we need to build a bigger 'war chest' too.

In early December 2010, WikiLeaks was receiving $120,000 per day  in donations from the general public. In response to pressure from Washington, and entirely outside the law, financial institutions, including Visa, MasterCard, PayPal, Bank of American and Western Union, erected a banking blockade against WikiLeaks, stripping the organization of 95% of its funding. Although WikiLeaks has won every court case to date against the blockade, these Washington linked institutions continue to appeal.

So, for the next 34 days, beginning on October 3 2012, we are launching a new fundraising campaign running up to Election Day, 6 November.

You can still donate to WikiLeaks using a variety of easy methods, including workarounds for Visa, MasterCard and PayPal. These donations go to fund WikiLeaks' publishing and infrastructure costs and our legal costs to fight the financial blockade. We are expecting an answer shortly on Visa's appeal against the Icelandic court's ruling that declared their blockade illegal, and decision makers are expected to meet soon on our European anti-trust banking case.

If you wish to contribute to Julian Assange's legal defence costs, you can still use your credit card but you will need to make a separate donation to the Julian Assange and WikiLeaks Staff Defence Fund, administered and audited by Derek Rothera & Co. Full details are on our donate page. You can also donate to the Bradley Manning Defense Fund from our site.

"The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting", Milan Kundera.

Julian Assange

Assange Extradition Determined by the Executive Not Courts Part 1 

28 September 2012, 01:51  

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html

Communicating with the Enemy US Attempts to Equate WikiLeaks as its Own Al Qaeda - Part 2

29 September 2012, 01:51  

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html

WikiLeaks Reveals US Detainee Policies: Camp Delta 

26 October 2012, 19:20  

John Robles

The US War on Terror is an illegal war and WikiLeaks has even more proof. The aggressive invasions are a crime against humanity, the killing of civilians and people defending their homelands are war crimes, the extra-judicial executions are illegal under all international standards and laws, the drone- strikes, Obama’s daily kill list, the black sites and illegal prisons worldwide, the torture and the illegal prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba are all criminal acts.

When the US declared a War on Terror, they declared a war on a brutal methodology for achieving and bringing about political change and the goals of organizations using terror to advance their agendas.

The War on Terror did not fall into the category of a normal war. First it did not fit the definition of a classic war, where one country declares war on another and armies are mobilized. It also did not have a defined enemy or field of battle, and lastly due to its nature it is an open ended and endless campaign, without borders and without limits.

Under normal circumstances the world’s population would have never allowed such an adventure with one country effectively declaring war on the world, the American public would also have questioned the questionable nature of the “War on Terror”, had it not been for the event that the Project for a New American Century said would be needed to begin an campaign of world military domination, namely the events of September 11, 2001.

Among the questions that came up with the War on Terror was what to do with those who fought back? In Afghanistan they could not be labeled prisoners of war, as no war was declared. They could not be called terrorists, as people who never did anything against the US and who were merely protecting their homes and families, could not rightfully be labeled such. So they were labeled “enemy combatants”, just one of the acts of legal twisting and obfuscation that was carried out by the US to legalize, after-the-fact, their illegal war, their illegal torture and their illegal detention.

The Site WikiLeaks has released some of the most important documents issued by the US covering the detention of these detainees, in particular the foundation document for the illegal terror prison in Guantanamo Bay Cuba , and the original pre-war-on-terror directive which had to be appended.

The original document, dated August 18, 1994 and re-issued in 2004 , called for adherence to the Geneva Conventions, point 2 (d) and reads: Under the Geneva Conventions Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War and for the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, on the outbreak of an armed conflict, or when persons are captured or detained by the U.S. Military Services in the course of the full range of military operations, ensure that a national-level information centre exists that can fully serve to account for all persons who pass through the care, custody, and control of the U.S. Military Services.” This directive was obviously violated at Guantanamo and worldwide at secret black sites and prisons all over the world.

According to the document released by WikiLeaks, the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for Camp Delta GTMO, Camp Delta was designed for “detained personnel”, how 15-year-old children who are attempting to defend their families can be classified as such is beyond me.

Chapter 1, point 1002 of the SOP says that "Hazing, corporal punishment, harassment, unauthorized exercises, unnecessary restriction, deprivations and demeaning treatment ‘serve no purpose’ and are prohibited.” How the torture, stress positions, isolation, sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation and other practices which are all documented as taking place regularly at Guantanamo were allowed to take place as standard procedure is also beyond me.

Point 140.4, regarding staffing, calls for a Chaplain but makes no mention of what religion. This does not take into account the fact that most of the detainees, if not all are and were practicing Muslims, you can make your own conclusion on this point.

Point 105.13.d regarding deadly force is interesting because it allows the “Commanding General” to order the use of deadly force for any reason.

In the document there has been a section deleted which deals with “call to prayer”, remember the detainees are almost exclusively Muslims, points 1 to 3 are deleted but point 4 mentions scheduled time(s) as part of operations. Points 6 and 7 mention which CD tracks to play.

Point 31 states what detainees are allowed to have, this includes a “finger toothbrush, a Koran, prayer beads, an orange suit and a mask!

The document repeats several issues multiple times, namely hunger strikes, call to prayer and prisoner abuse.

The document deals little with interrogations, where torture is likely to take place. However point 3012.1 allows for detainee escort teams to leave their detainees “unattended or unsecured” as directed by the SOP for the Joint Interagency Interrogation Facility. A location that demands further research.

Point 3013.2.1 Defines the physical control that is to be maintained over the detainees, this includes two points of physical contact by each member of the escort team.

Point 4005.6 mentions a three-piece-suit, there is little information on this device, but apparently it is a metal suit which brutally holds the detainee in any position they deem necessary. Point 4005 details how detainees are to be shackled, handcuffed and an in other means “secured”.

If one follows the headings and the numbering of the document it is clear that there have been redactions and deletions. What is most glaring is the absence of any information regarding interrogations and almost nothing about abuse which could be termed torture.

In the near future, I will be going through all of the WikiLeaks releases and keep you informed.

The writer can be reached at jar2@list.ru. All views and opinions are my own.

Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2012_10_26/WikiLeaks-reveals-US-detainee-policies/

Julian Assange Calls Obama a Hypocrite Kristinn Hrafnsson  - Part 3

1 October 2012, 13:06  

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html

President of Australian Lawyers Alliance Speaks Out in Defense of Assange Greg Barns

29 August 2012, 11:36

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Greg_Barns.html

Assange’s Future Plans: "Right to Request Political Asylum is a Human Right" Kristinn Hrafnsson

15 August 2012, 12:29

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html

Wikileaks and Datacell: An Inconvenient Truth? Andreas Fink

16 July 2012, 17:32

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Andreas_Fink.html

Assange and Truth: A Plea from Christine Assange Christine Assange

Open letter to the Australian people from Christine Assange – mother of Julian Assange

2 July 2012, 16:28

Letter to Ecuadorian President in support of Assange  Mary Kostakidis

2 July 2012, 16:28

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Mary_Kostakidis.html

Original Suspicions About Assange/WikiLeaks Are Assange and Wikileaks a huge disinformation operation by U.S. intelligence? By John Robles

20 June 2012, 13:33

Hello dear reader, hope you are well. Once again the (in)famous Julian Assange is making headlines and grabbing the attention of the world’s media. Not that I have a problem with this, the only thing is that the circus atmosphere and the constant media attention seems to be taking the focus away from what should be the real story with Julian. But that is the way it seems to be with him, things just don’t add up when it comes to Julian and for me that has been a fact since day one.

If you are a fan of Julian and Wikileaks and believe everything they claim about exposing secrets to bring about accountability and that government secrecy must be stopped etc. read no further.

From its inception the whole thing seemed quite strange, bizarre really. First the name “Wikileaks”, it seemed like an obvious attempt to profit off of and by proxy grant credibility by association by using a name so similar to that other famous and globally trusted “Wiki”, a source of information almost all of us uses from time to time.

For from its outset that is exactly what “Wikileaks” lacked for me, credibility. But as I am one who attempts to always be fair and keep an open mind I tried to believe. Unfortunately the attempt did not work. For starters it seems too glib, too slick, too snake oily. Here was a site asking, openly, without a wink of the eye or an obfuscation of the language for anyone, anywhere to send it the secrets of their governments and just to be even more interesting, of their corporations. And of course, anonymity was guaranteed.

There were already sites out there that were dedicated in one way or another to exposing government malfeasance, war crimes, corruption and so on and so forth, run by people living on the fringes and in fear, getting shut down, blocked, being harassed and some site owners disappearing, having strange accidents, heart failure, being suicided, being stripped of their citizenship or outright killed. Sites like this still exist but their number has dropped considerably. Yes, there were many, all trying quietly to fight for the truth and for the most part existing on meager budgets and with no funding.

During the dark ages of the Bush era and after 9-11 there were thousands which sprang up, all being dealt with one after the other. Just ask any 9-11 Truther about the tactics used by the US Government to shut down, get rid of, and in the end shut up anyone who tried to expose the lies surrounding 9-11 and the subsequent wars of aggression, Guantanamo, and torture incorporated. Behind every one of those sites there was a person, afraid but ready to fight for the truth. And then out of nowhere, BAM!!! Here comes Wikileaks, spouting off and trying to present itself as the be all, end all wholesale clearing house of secret internet information, a MegaMart of truth and secret documents. That’s right, anyone anywhere send us your proof of crimes by your government, anonymity guaranteed, they claimed.

To me and many who had contact with Assange back in the Cypherpunk days, it seemed odd. Who Assange, a hacker with an interest in cryptography, or worse, the front man for a government front seeking to put an end to as many whistleblowers as possible, once and for all? Ask Manning. Even more probable he is simply a snake oil salesman looking to make a quick buck.

This latter version is backed up by documents on the internet, in particular on the site cryptome.org, run by an often harassed and shut down John Young, which has a collection of documents from Wikileaks insiders and Assange himself. In one of the documents an anonymous source going by the code name “Wikileaks Insider” details how Assange bragged about how Wikileaks had ”…no headquarters, no office, no formal structure other than the name and the truth-seeking ideology attached to it.” Yet at the time Assange was seeking $600,000.00, yes dear reader, over half a million, for the overall budget of Wikileaks and $200,000.00 just to, as Insider put it, “keep the lights on”.

In a pledge drive mailing, dated January 7, 2007, the Wikileaks Advisory Board stated, and I quote: “We can succeed at a slower / scale limited way with under $50,000 / year & volunteers, but it is our goal to raise pledges of $5m by July.” That is a lot of money, $5 million in 6 months!

According to “Wikileaks Insider” Assange was prepared to throw Manning to the dogs to cover his own posterior as he and Manning had been planning to sell the Iraq and Afghanistan information to news and media corporations.

Another problem with Wikileaks was their guarantee of anonymity, anyone who knows a little about the internet knows that when you sit down in front of your computer, and even worse go online, there is no guarantee that you are not being watched or monitored. Again according to “Insider”: “Wikileaks is a very serious accident just waiting to happen,they convince the whistle blower that their anonymity is protected, and their data is secured. Nothing could be further from the truth.” Again ask Manning.

If we look at the information released by Wikileaks from an intelligence standpoint and do a damage control assessment using the material that is already out there, then what we see is a lot of smoke and almost no fire.

Even with all of the noise and media attention that the Iraq and Afghanistan files have raised, from an intelligence viewpoint, they exposed no real “secrets” which caused damage to the United States. Sure so and so thought the Ambassador of country “A” was a lout, but is that a state secret? The most damage was done to informants and Afghanis but I suppose they were all expendable to the U.S. and maybe even liabilities to begin with.

All of this talk about damage is irrelevant anyway, when it comes to Wikileaks, because Assange, being the “upstanding citizen” he is, apparently cleared everything with Pentagon vetters before he released anything, which made anything he released useless.

Despite this the media and world intelligence services were ties up for months sifting through everything trying to gain some piece of useful intelligence or secret. All of this pointing, once again, to some tie between Assange and the U.S. and begs the question, “Is Assange and Wikileaks a huge disinformation operation by U.S. intelligence?”

Other facts and inconsistencies in the whole affair also point to a “special” relationship between Assange and the U.S. If we compare the Victor Bout case and Assange’s many more questions arise. First and foremost for me is; if Assange is really wanted by the U.S. and really caused so much damage, why has it been so difficult for them to get him?

Victor Bout was in a third country and was wanted on circumstantial and very weak evidence and his extradition was opposed by the largest country in the world, yet they still illegally, for want of a better word “kidnapped” him and took him to the U.S. Assange is on the territory of the U.S.’ staunchest ally, walking around giving press conferences and we are supposed to believe the U.S. could not get him. The last country anyone with such issues with the U.S. would want to be is in the U.K., but here is Assange, giving press conferences when he should have been in hiding running for his life as he was apparently being hunted by U.S. intelligence services.

Therefore we can conclude that he is connected with U.S. intelligence, why not? Who else would profit from gaining the secrets of the world’s governments. Too bad we can not ask Manning.

On the other hand, if he is not a U.S. agent, asset, or in some other way operating for them, then he is a snake oil salesman who failed miserably in an attempt to sell information to the world’s media. Nobody bought it.

In the middle of all this we are also believe that Assange was set up by someone on rape charges to extradite him to the U.S. from Sweden. Why are we supposed to believe that it would be easier to get him in Sweden? If they had wanted him the best place to get him was the U.K., I am sorry, I don’t buy it.

Now Assange has asked for asylum, but from what country? China? The Russian Federation? Cuba? North Korea? No, these countries with political stances and positions often opposed by the U.S. were not on Assange’s list. Why? Perhaps because they know it is all a crock. So he went to the Ecuadorian Embassy and asked for asylum. Perhaps the intelligence services of Ecuador will believe it all.

Again, the whole thing just does not add up, too bad we can’t ask Manning.

Have a good one.

Australia Gave Up on Assange Senator Scott Ludlam

22 June 2012, 20:43

http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Scott_Ludlum.html

Little Chance for Fairness in Manning Case John Robles  

29 May 2012, 21:51

Little chance for fairness in Manning case

The court-martial hearing in the Bradley Manning case is scheduled to be held in September and according to statements

The court-martial hearing in the Bradley Manning case is scheduled to be held in September and according to statements released by the defense team and a recent filing at the Fort Meade, Maryland military court, they are being hampered by the state’s inadequate response with regards to the production of evidence, including delays and even failure to disclose, that may prove their client’s innocence or significantly reduce his sentence.

The case being as such, less than four months is not enough time for them to properly prepare to counter the arguments and charges of the state which carry the possibility of life imprisonment for their client.

In all Manning is facing 22 charges all related to the release of the mountain of classified and sensitive information that was passed to the site Wikileaks.

The brief history of the case is as follows: in May 2010 Bradley Edward Manning was arrested while on duty in Iraq, where he was working as an intelligence analyst, on charges of having passed classified information to the website WikiLeaks. After his arrest the state broadened the scope of his charges to include several more serious charges which included communicating national defense information to an unauthorized source and the most serious; aiding the enemy which is a capital offense. The state prosecutors have stated that they would not seek the death penalty in this case.

As an analyst for the army Manning had had access to the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet), a system of interconnected computer networks used by the United States Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of State to transmit classified information, up to and including information classified SECRET.

According to information in the public domain the system operates by using a system of packet switching over the TCP/IP protocols in what they call a 'completely secure' environment". SIPRNet is the U.S. Department of Defense's classified version of the civilian Internet and is the SECRET component of the Defense Information Systems Network.

In the latest defense motion, title “Motion to Compel Discovery” lead defense attorney David Edward Coombs makes several statements and accusations that may be surprising in their scope and in the level of negligence the government has shown in not permitting such a high-profile defendant to properly defend himself.

Many experts and human rights workers all over the world see this as only one in a long line of abuses in this case. The case has attracted international attention for many reasons and has reflected badly on the entire U.S. legal system.

Last summer the international community was up in arms over the treatment that was being given to Manning and the way he was being incarcerated, conditions that many say amounted to torture. Among other things he was subject to stress positions and to enduring long periods of time without sleep and nude. There were many who were afraid, including his defense lawyers, that he was being driven mad by the conditions under which he was being kept. At one point this included being asked every five minutes if he was okay.

All of the facts so far do not point to the possibility that Manning will be given the opportunity to receive a fair trial. He was the chosen scapegoat for what the US characterized as a historic intelligence failure, something conspiracy theorists say was an orchestrated release to tie up the intelligence agencies of the world with disinformation and to serve as the spark to ignite the color revolutions of the Arab spring. According to experts these two things were the only real tangible effects of the release of the information that was attributed to Manning.

The brunt of the defense motion has to do with what is called Brady material, named after the name of the case that brought the law regarding discovery into effect. In the motion Coombs said the U.S. government is not conducting the required Brady searches in a diligent and timely manner.

In point 26 he writes that the defense had just learned that on 29 July 2011, the Government sent out a memo to the Headquarters of the Department of the Army requesting it to task Principal Officials to search for, and preserve, any discoverable information. According to a Memorandum for Principal

Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army, dated April 17, 2012 no action was taken for nine months in response to the Government's request for Brady and other potentially discoverable material. Thus the Defense requests action to taken in line with the April 17, 20l2 government request.

Mr. Coombs continued by saying that the Government has not yet completed a Brady search of its own files (i.e. files which are clearly in the possession, custody, and control of military authorities) even though two years have elapsed since PFC Manning was arrested. This fact does not does not inspire confidence that the Government has diligently conducted a Brady search of other agencies as it was supposed to have done.

ln fact, he says,there are huge questions and inconsistencies in the Government's statements regarding its search for Brady material. For instance the Defense received 12-pages of Brady material several weeks ago, detailing responses by various government agencies that the alleged leaks did little to no damage to those organizations. The Defense was troubled that it was only now receiving such Brody material.

Based on the nature of that Brady material, the Defense believes there is much more similar Brady material out there that the Government has not disclosed. The Defense asked the Government why it was only now receiving such material.  

The answer is clear, it is not in the interests of the government to assist in the Manning’s defense, if he is found innocent and the huge house of cards that has been built up around him comes crashing down many officials at all levels will have to face the piper and while the foxes are guarding the chicken coop assisting someone they accuse is not something that can ever be expected, no matter how much lip service is paid to innocence before guilty.

Have a nice day, wherever you may be.]

  2011

 

  2010

WikiLeaks A Psy-Op Said John Young

John Young of Cryptome, "'Internet a very large-scale spying machine' - info leaking site co-founder," RT, 29 December, 2010, at

http://rt.com/news/cryptome-classified-secret-wikileaks/

  2009

 

2008

 

  2007

Is Assange running for the office of US President? Wikileaks exclusive press releaseAssange: A snake oil salesman?President of Australian Lawyers Alliance speaks out in defense of Assange - interview Assange extradition determined by the executive not courts – exclusive interviewJulian Assange calls Obama a hypocrite - interview  http://m.ruvr.ru/2012/10/01/1288499761/220px-Wikileaks_Spokesperson_Kristinn_Hr..ank,_Brisbane,_Australia_110623.jpg

Assange officially files to run for Australian Senate"Our government refused to listen to us" - WikiLeaks' co-founder Castro

WikiLeaks Джулиан Ассанж посольство эквадор

 

NO ONE GOES AGAINST GOVERNMENTS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ENJOYS THIS KIND OF SUPPORT FROM CORPORATE INTERESTS AND MEDIA - WIKILEAKS IS A HUGE PSYOP

 

Last Update: 11/15/2017 13:23 +0300

 

Site 1JAR2 Blog Button

 

JAR2 Biz

 

 Link to JAR2 Twitter Account  Link to JAR2 YouTube Account  Link to JAR2 Blogger Account  Link to JAR2 Live Journal Account  Link to JAR2 Word Press Account    Link to JAR2 Sonation and Support Page

 

 

Copyright JAR2 2003-2017 All Rights Reserved

Publishing Banned Truth Since June 06, 2003